Maintenance Addendum EMC ControlCenter 6.1

Canadian Common Criteria Scheme (CCCS)

Maintenance Report

EMC ControlCenter® 6.1

 Issued by:

Communications Security Establishment

Certification Body

Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and Certification Scheme

© 2008 Government of Canada, Communications Security Establishment

Document number 383-7-30-MR
Version 1.1
Date September 15, 2008

1 Introduction

On 27 August 2008, Electronic Warfare Associates-Canada (EWA-Canada) submitted an Impact Analysis Report to the CCS Certification Body on behalf of EMC Corporation, the developer of the EMC ControlCenter® 6.1 product. The Impact Analysis Report is intended to satisfy requirements outlined in version 1.0 of the Common Criteria document CCIMB-2004-02-009: Assurance Continuity: CCRA Requirements. In accordance with those requirements, the Impact Analysis Report (IAR) describes the changes made to EMC ControlCenter® 6.1 (the maintained Target of Evaluation), the evidence updated as a result of the changes and the security impact of the changes.

2 Description of changes to the TOE

The following characterizes the changes implemented in the EMC ControlCenter® 6.1. For each change, it was verified that there were no required changes to the security functional requirements in the ST, and thorough functional and regression testing was conducted by the developer to ensure that the assurance in the Target of Evaluation (TOE) was maintained. The changes in the EMC ControlCenter® 6.1 comprise bug fixes resulting from defects detected and resolved through the QA/test process.

3 Description of Changes to the IT Environment

Changes to the IT Environment are permissible under assurance continuity provided that they do not change the certified TOE. A modified ST was provided which listed the updated software. EMC Corporation subjected the TOE to complete regression testing. The changes to the IT Environment (product) include the addition of support for additional operating systems and security improvements. The security improvements include secure communication between the various ControlCenter components, key management, protection of secrets, and support of SNMP v3.

4 Affected developer evidence

Modifications to the product necessitated changes to a subset of the developer evidence that was previously submitted for the TOE. The set of affected developer evidence was identified in the IAR.

Modifications to the security target were made to reflect the new product versions.

5 Conclusion

The changes to the TOE were bug fixes. Through functional and regression testing of the EMC ControlCenter® 6.1, assurance gained in the original TOE certification was maintained. As all of the changes to the TOE have been classified as minor, it is the conclusion of the CB that the maintained TOE is appropriate for assurance continuity and re-evaluation is not required.

6 References